MSFT
Microsoft CorporationClose $419.09EOD onlyThis page reflects MSFT options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.
Historical consensus-supported lens with full content, report chain context, and metric rail.
You are viewing an older report from April 7, 2026. A newer flow report is available for May 21, 2026.
View latest reportFlow Verdict
Watch next session: Activity at 2026-04-08 expiries: flows at $365-$375 (large expiry prints); Build or defense of the $380 pin (watch call OI/GEX at $380 and any quiet buying into that level)
Flow Summary
Net premium: -$260.4M bearish skew (net premium into puts)
P/C volume ratio: 0.70 — call-dominant on volume, but not extreme
P/C OI ratio: 0.45 — OI is call-heavy (structural call concentration)
Notable Prints
Read-through: Large ATM call flow at expiry suggests participants either speculating on upside into the close or dealers are being short gamma at that strike — supports pin risk at $372.50 and increased gamma sensitivity into expiry.
Read-through: Heavy put flow 2% below spot into same-day expiry signals short-term downside hedging or speculation; this contrasts with call-heavy volume — indicates large, targeted hedges at the lower expiry strikes.
Read-through: Significant ITM call volume at the $370 expiry strengthens pin pressure at $370 (also pre-computed max pain) and suggests heavy activity from participants with expiring exposure.
Read-through: Concentrated put flow slightly below spot reinforces short-term downside interest; fits with the cluster of same-day expiry puts and suggests institutional hedging or speculative downside positioning.
Read-through: A sizable notional at $490 (deep ITM for a put) suggests corporate-level hedging or structured trade (e.g., purchased puts backstopping previously sold calls or convertible hedges). Because it's long-dated, it's more likely hedging/structure than pure near-term speculation.
Institutional Positioning
Call additions: Structural call OI concentrated above spot in the $380-$400+ area (top OI strikes include $380: 8,542 OI; $400: 6,263 OI; and large long-dated call OI at $400-$525). On volume, there are heavy ATM/near-ATM short-dated call prints but overall OI shows call-heavy positioning above spot.
Put additions: Significant short-dated put flow into the 4/08 expiry clustered at $360-$370 (examples: $365 put OI 3,487; unusual expiry prints at $365, $367.5, $370, $372.5). Net premium is strongly negative (-$260.4M), indicating heavy premium into puts concentrated at various strikes in the premium flow table (notably high-strike puts in longer-dated buckets).
GEX/DEX consistency: Partially consistent: positive GEX (+$60.9M) and near-term GEX concentration at $372.50-$380.00 supports pinning around $370-$380; however net premium into puts conflicts with call-heavy OI and call-dominant volume, producing the 'mixed' flow regime.
OI clusters: Near-term OI clusters: Calls concentrated at $380 (8,542), $390 (6,819), $400 (6,263); Puts concentrated at $370 (3,797), $365 (3,487), $335 (3,128). The $370/$372.50 area is both a max-pain pin and a put OI cluster, creating a near-term magnet/support band while the $380-$400 call clusters act as resistance walls.
Hedging evidence: Clear short-dated hedging: heavy same-day expiry put buying (4/08) indicates protective positioning. The large 6/18 $490 puts imply structured or corporate hedges. There is limited evidence of coordinated collar activity in the near-term chain — more one-sided put buying around expiry.
Max pain context: Max pain sits at $370 for the next several expirations and spot ($372.29) is effectively 'At' MP per pre-computed fields. Combined with GEX pinning at $372.50 and $375.00, dealers are positioned to pin price into the $370-$375 zone into expiry.
Signal vs Noise
Key Conclusions
Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.
Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.
These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.