thetaOwl

MSTR

Strategy IncClose $164.85EOD only
Max Pain
$170.00
Next expiry May 22, 2026
Expected Move
±$4.73
2.9% from close
Price Gap
+5.15
Distance to max pain
IV Rank
35
Middle-high premium
P/C OI
0.90
Slightly call-heavy
Consensus
5.5/10
Range bias
Published snapshot: May 21, 2026 close
End-of-day snapshot

This page reflects MSTR options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.

Published Snapshot
May 21, 2026 close
MSTR Flow Report
Analysis based on market close April 6, 2026

Historical consensus-supported lens with full content, report chain context, and metric rail.

You are viewing an older report from April 6, 2026. A newer flow report is available for May 21, 2026.

View latest report

Flow Verdict

BiasBearish
Confirmation: Net premium flips positive or P/C volume ratio drops below 0.8
Invalidation: Spot breaks above $135 with heavy call buying
Confidence:
5 / 10
base 5; -1 GEX/flow contradict; +1 GEX positive (pinning)

Watch next session: $120-$124 put flow for hedging; $130-$132 call OI buildup

Flow Summary

Net premium: -$268.7M bearish

P/C volume ratio: 1.08 — put-dominant

P/C OI ratio: 0.86 — moderate call lean

Mixed signals: net premium heavily bearish and put volume dominates, but OI leans call-heavy with positive GEX pinning spot higher. Flow suggests hedging near-term downside while positioning remains bullish longer-term.

Notable Prints

#1
MSTR 2026-04-10 $120 Put
Vol: 6,738
OI: 1,770
Vol/OI: 3.8x
IV: 82.4%
Notional: ~$1.0M
Intent: Near-term protective hedging
Dual read: Bought (bearish) or sold/covered (neutral)

Read-through: Consistent with high-vol regime and spot above max pain ($124)

#2
MSTR 2026-04-10 $127 Put
Vol: 3,180
OI: 675
Vol/OI: 4.7x
IV: 75.4%
Notional: ~$1.2M
Intent: At-the-money hedging
Dual read: Bought (bearish) or sold/covered (neutral)

Read-through: Direct hedge against current spot, likely short-term protection

#3
MSTR 2026-04-10 $126 Put
Vol: 2,331
OI: 475
Vol/OI: 4.9x
IV: 76.8%
Notional: ~$776k
Intent: Near-term downside protection
Dual read: Bought (bearish) or sold/covered (neutral)

Read-through: Supports hedging narrative around $124-$127 zone

#4
MSTR 2026-04-10 $141 Call
Vol: 1,347
OI: 353
Vol/OI: 3.8x
IV: 75.7%
Notional: ~$714k
Intent: Upside speculation
Dual read: Bought (bullish) or sold/overwritten (neutral)

Read-through: Contrarian bullish bet above call OI wall ($135-$140)

#5
MSTR 2026-05-08 $75 Put
Vol: 1,994
OI: 478
Vol/OI: 4.2x
IV: 112.1%
Notional: ~$1.4M
Intent: Long-term tail-risk hedge
Dual read: Bought (bearish) or sold/covered (neutral)

Read-through: Deep OTM protection, likely portfolio insurance

Institutional Positioning

Call additions: $130-$136 calls in near-term expirations

Put additions: $120-$128 puts in April expirations

GEX/DEX consistency: No — positive GEX (+$98.5M) contradicts bearish net premium

OI clusters: $135-$140 call wall (33K+ OI), $100-$105 put floor (40K+ OI)

Hedging evidence: Yes — concentrated put flow at $120-$128 suggests protective hedging

Max pain context: Spot ($127.69) above near-term max pain ($124), creating pinning pressure upward

Signal vs Noise

~Deep OTM puts ($75, $102) are likely tail-risk hedges, not directional bets
~High-volume put flow near spot ($126-$128) may be expiration-related hedging
~Large net premium outliers ($315-$1070 strikes) are likely structured positions or spreads, not directional flow

Key Conclusions

⚠️Net premium -$268.7M bearish, but positive GEX pinning spot higher
🛡️Heavy put flow at $120-$128 suggests near-term hedging
🧲Call OI wall at $135-$140 creates resistance, put floor at $100-$105 creates support
How to Use These Reports
This flow reflects the market close on April 6, 2026.
What the reports do

Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.

How traders use them

Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.

What to remember

These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.

If the report conviction and the raw data disagree, slow down and resolve the mismatch before sizing risk.