Home Options MSTRReports

MSTR

Strategy IncClose $165.81EOD only

Max Pain

$170.00

Next expiry May 22, 2026

Expected Move

±$7.35

4.4% from close

Price Gap

+4.19

Distance to max pain

IV Rank

Middle-high premium

P/C OI

0.90

Balanced positioning

Consensus

6.5/10

Bullish tilt

Published snapshot: May 20, 2026 close

End-of-day snapshot

This page reflects MSTR options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.

Published Snapshot

May 20, 2026 close

MSTR Flow Report

Analysis based on market close March 31, 2026

Directional Theta Gang Flow Earnings Consensus

Historical consensus-supported lens with full content, report chain context, and metric rail.

You are viewing an older report from March 31, 2026. A newer flow report is available for May 20, 2026.

View latest report

Flow Verdict

Confidence:

7.5 / 10

base 5; +2 massive net put premium; +1 GEX pinning & spot below MP; -0.5 P/C volume ratio call-dominant

Watch next session: $124P 4/2 flow for pinning; Any call buying above $130 to challenge OI walls; Follow-up in $210P 4/17 position

Flow Summary

Net premium: -$398.9M bearish

P/C volume ratio: 0.56 — call-dominant volume

P/C OI ratio: 0.85 — moderate put lean in positioning

A stark divergence exists: high call volume (P/C 0.56) is overwhelmed by massive, concentrated put premium selling (-$398.9M net). This points to institutional hedging or outright bearish bets at far OTM strikes, with spot pinned below max pain and positive GEX suggesting mean reversion lower is favored.

Notable Prints

MSTR 4/17 $210 Put

Vol: 7,222

OI: 1,599

Vol/OI: 4.5x

IV: 135.4%

Notional: ~$9.1M (premium: $1,260/contract est.)

Intent: Large-scale protective put purchase or volatility sale.

Dual read: Bought for crash protection (bearish) or sold for premium (neutral/bullish).

Read-through: Given the extreme IV and massive net put premium flow, this is likely a purchase for tail-risk hedging, not a sale. A defining bearish signal.

MSTR 4/2 $124 Put

Vol: 3,497

OI: 741

Vol/OI: 4.7x

IV: 66.3%

Notional: ~$0.7M (premium: $200/contract est.)

Intent: Near-term directional bet or hedge against a drop below spot.

Dual read: Bought (bearish) or sold (neutral/bullish).

Read-through: With spot at $124.80, this is an at-the-money bet for the 2-day expiry. Flow context suggests this is likely bought protection, aligning with the pinning regime below max pain ($137).

MSTR 4/10 $138 Call

Vol: 10,276

OI: 2,895

Vol/OI: 3.5x

IV: 63.6%

Notional: ~$1.0M (premium: $100/contract est.)

Intent: Upside speculation targeting a move toward the $137-$140 OI cluster.

Dual read: Bought (bullish breakout) or sold (neutral/bearish, betting against a rally).

Read-through: Given the high volume and OI build at $138, this is likely fresh long call buying attempting to challenge the overhead call wall. However, it's dwarfed by the put premium.

MSTR 4/2 $160 Put

Vol: 1,632

OI: 210

Vol/OI: 7.8x

IV: 233.2%

Notional: ~$2.6M (premium: $1,600/contract est.)

Intent: Extreme OTM protective put purchase.

Dual read: Almost certainly bought for catastrophic hedge given astronomical IV.

Read-through: Another piece of the institutional hedging puzzle. Paying huge premium for 2-day, 28% OTM protection signals acute fear of a major downside gap.

MSTR 4/24 $155 Call

Vol: 2,659

OI: 636

Vol/OI: 4.2x

IV: 68.9%

Notional: ~$0.4M (premium: $150/contract est.)

Intent: Long-dated upside call buying.

Dual read: Bought (bullish) or sold (neutral/bearish).

Read-through: A longer-dated call play, but again, its premium impact is negligible compared to the mega-put flow.

Institutional Positioning

Call additions: $138 4/10 and $155 4/24 calls show speculative long interest, but premium is small.

Put additions: Massive OTM put buying at $210 (4/17), $200 (4/17), $180 (4/10), and $160 (4/2). This is the dominant positioning signal.

GEX/DEX consistency: Yes — Positive GEX (+$50.1M) indicates pinning/mean reversion. Spot below max pain ($124.8 vs $137) suggests pinning pressure is to the downside, aligning with put flow.

OI clusters: Major call walls at $135 (33K OI), $140 (33K OI), $130 (28K OI). Major put support at $100 (23K OI) and extreme OI at $5 PUT (26K+ OI, likely legacy/positioning).

Hedging evidence: Overwhelming. The multi-strike, high-IV, far OTM put purchases ($160, $180, $200, $210) are textbook institutional tail-risk hedging.

Max pain context: Spot ($124.80) is 8.9% below nearest max pain ($137). The falling MP trend across expiries ($137 → $120) suggests options positioning is shifting to lower strike anchors, supportive of a bearish drift.

Signal vs Noise

~High call volume (P/C 0.56) is noise relative to premium. Many small, speculative call buys are drowned out by a few massive put hedges.

~The $5 PUT OI (26,523) is extreme noise — likely legacy positions or synthetic longs, not indicative of current flow intent.

~Some of the near-dated call flow (e.g., $122C 4/2) could be part of delta-hedging or closing trades, not fresh directional bets.

Key Conclusions

⚠️Massive, concentrated put premium (-$398.9M) defines the flow. This is institutional hedging, not retail speculation.

📌Spot pinned below max pain with positive GEX favors mean reversion lower toward $120-$125 support.

🧱Heavy call OI walls at $130, $135, $140 create strong overhead resistance for any rally attempt.

🔀High call volume is a misleading signal; focus on net premium and OTM put activity for true directional bias.

How to Use These Reports

This flow reflects the market close on March 31, 2026.

What the reports do

Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.

How traders use them

Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.

What to remember

These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.

If the report conviction and the raw data disagree, slow down and resolve the mismatch before sizing risk.