thetaOwl

TLT

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETFClose $87.07EOD only
Max Pain
$86.50
Next expiry Apr 20, 2026
Expected Move
±$0.46
0.5% from close
Price Gap
-0.57
Distance to max pain
IV Rank
100
High premium
P/C OI
0.61
Slightly call-heavy
Consensus
6.5/10
Bullish tilt
Published snapshot: Apr 17, 2026 close
End-of-day snapshot

This page reflects TLT options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.

Published Snapshot
Apr 17, 2026 close
TLT Flow Report
Analysis based on market close April 10, 2026

Historical consensus-supported lens with full content, report chain context, and metric rail.

You are viewing an older report from April 10, 2026. A newer flow report is available for April 17, 2026.

View latest report

Flow Verdict

BiasNeutral-to-Bearish
Confirmation: Continuation of net premium negative (further large put premium flow >$5M) and increasing P/C volume toward >0.9 with spot holding ≤ $86.50
Invalidation: Sustained short-dated call follow-through (net premium flips positive, P/C volume <0.5) and spot closes > $87.00 with rising vols at calls
Confidence:
6 / 10
base 5; +1 pinning GEX (+$528.5M) supports pin; -1 mixed flow / net premium negative (-$12.4M)

Watch next session: Short-dated 4/13-4/17 call flow at $86.50-$87.00 (will show if call prints are directional); Put premium and volume at $85.00-$86.00 (protective puts that would confirm bearish tilt)

Flow Summary

Net premium: -$12.4M bearish

P/C volume ratio: 0.61 — call-dominant by volume

P/C OI ratio: 0.63 — moderate call lean in positioning

Volume shows short-dated call demand (heavy prints at the $87 area) while premium flow overall is negative driven by outsized put premium at multiple strikes (notably $115, $96, $94 and near-term $86/$85). Dealers sit with large positive GEX (+$528.5M) creating a pinning environment around ~$86-$87 even as institutions appear to be buying downside protection — net effect is mixed: short-dated call activity can keep spot pinned, but larger-put premium bias points to institutional risk-off positioning.

Notable Prints

#1
TLT 2026-04-13 $87.00 Call
Vol: 24,843
OI: 1,811
Vol/OI: 13.7x
IV: 8.3%
Notional: ~$4,650,076
Intent: Fresh short-dated directional call buying / gamma scalping (dealer hedging)
Dual read: Aggressive buyers (bullish) OR market-makers selling/writing calls and delta-hedging (neutral/pin)

Read-through: High short-dated call flow at $87 is consistent with pin attempts around $86-$87; given low IV (8.3%) and huge vol/OI this is meaningful and likely to force dealer hedging that buys underlying into intraday dips.

#2
TLT 2026-04-13 $86.00 Put
Vol: 6,137
OI: 1,566
Vol/OI: 3.9x
IV: 9.0%
Notional: ~$2,164,430
Intent: Protective put buying or directional put accumulation
Dual read: Risk-hedge (long bond positions buying protection) OR aggressive put sellers being opened (less likely given net premium flows)

Read-through: Significant near-the-money put flow aligns with institutional hedging. This contributes to net negative premium and is consistent with dealers being long gamma near spot.

#3
TLT 2026-04-13 $86.50 Call / Put (dual activity)
Vol: 4,087
OI: 1,450
Vol/OI: 2.8x
IV: 8.2%
Notional: ~$~98k (call) / ~$1,589,228 (put at nearby strikes from premium flow)
Intent: Short-dated call buying (4/13 $86.50 call vol) vs heavy put flow across 4/13-4/15 strikes — mixed trades (straddle-like rebalancing or separate hedges)
Dual read: Could be spread/structure (call buys with put buys elsewhere) or independent directional bets

Read-through: Dual activity centered at $86.50/$86.00 indicates concentrated positioning around gamma flip (~$86). Matches GEX pinning behavior; net premium still skewed to puts.

#4
TLT 2026-04-15 $85.50 Put
Vol: 2,529
OI: 664
Vol/OI: 3.8x
IV: 10.5%
Notional: ~$1,732,048 (aggregate premium flow at prox strike $81/$85 shown in top premiums)
Intent: Protective/portfolio hedging (near-term puts just below spot)
Dual read: Hedging (protective) or speculative short-dated put buying (bearish)

Read-through: Concentrated put volume just below spot reinforces institutional demand for downside protection; likely to keep dealers positioned to buy into weakness.

#5
TLT 2026-05-08 $87.00 Call
Vol: 7,222
OI: 2,418
Vol/OI: 3.0x
IV: 10.7%
Notional: ~$? (top premium flow shows meaningful longer-dated call presence at $87 ~$0.79*7,222*100 ≈ $569k)
Intent: Front-month call accumulation further out (possible directional or spread leg for roll)
Dual read: Directional call buy or part of multi-leg positioning (calendar/spread)

Read-through: Adds to call-side demand at $87 across expirations; supports continued dealer pinning if follow-through occurs.

Institutional Positioning

Call additions: $86.50-$87.00 short-dated calls (4/13-4/17) and some 5/8 $87.00 activity — concentrated near-the-money call demand that pressures dealers to hedge by buying spot

Put additions: Material put premium bought at $86.00 (4/13) and $85.50 (4/15), plus larger premium flow at further strikes ($94, $96, $115 in top premium list) indicating protective or outright bearish positioning

GEX/DEX consistency: Yes — large positive GEX (+$528.5M) and concentrated near-term positive GEX nodes at $87.00/$87.50/$86.50 are consistent with pinning; dealer gamma exposure will amplify short-dated call flow impact despite net negative premium.

OI clusters: Major call OI cluster out at $95-$110 (structural wall) and near-term clusters: calls around $92.00 (7,659 OI) and $87.50-$88.00; puts clustered at $85.00 (11,461 OI) and $82.00/$81.00 — these create a near-term pin/magnet between $85-$87 and a longer-term call cap above $95.

Hedging evidence: Clear evidence of hedging: significant near-the-money put buys (4/13 $86, 4/15 $85.50) consistent with protective positions; limited evidence of widespread collars but the mix of short calls + puts indicates some structures and rolling hedges.

Max pain context: Max pain pins at $86 across expirations and a flat MP trend align with dealer gamma concentration and the observed activity — market is primed to stay near $86-$87 unless a large directional block breaks the pin.

Signal vs Noise

~Very high short-dated call volume at $87 (4/13) may be dealer gamma-driven flow (market-maker write/hedge) rather than pure directional conviction — treat as mixed until followed by price action.
~Top premium negatives at distant strikes (e.g., $115 put flow) are likely portfolio protection or structured hedges rather than outright directional bets on immediate move.
~Some call activity in May expirations (5/8 $87) could be roll/extension from near-term positions rather than fresh directional buys.
~Low IV and pinning regime increases likelihood that flows represent gamma scalping and hedger activity rather than pure directional flow.

Key Conclusions

⚖️Mixed flow: short-dated call volume is large but net premium is negative (-$12.4M) — balance favors protection/puts with local pinning around $86-$87.
📌Pin zone confirmed: dealers' positive GEX (+$528.5M) and GEX concentration at $87.00/$86.50 support a price magnet near $86-$87.
🛡️Institutions are buying downside protection at $86.00 and $85.50 (4/13-4/15) — suggests risk-off hedging of long bond exposure.
🔁Large 4/13 $87 call print is meaningful in volume (24,843) but low IV and high GEX imply dealer hedging may be primary driver — watch for price to confirm.
🧭Key levels to monitor: support ~$86.00 (max pain & put cluster), secondary support ~$85.00 (put OI cluster), resistance range ~$95-$110 (call OI wall) with near-term resistance at ~$87.00 (GEX pin)
How to Use These Reports
This flow reflects the market close on April 10, 2026.
What the reports do

Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.

How traders use them

Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.

What to remember

These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.

If the report conviction and the raw data disagree, slow down and resolve the mismatch before sizing risk.