USO
United States Oil FundClose $137.27EOD onlyThis page reflects USO options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.
Historical consensus-supported lens with full content, report chain context, and metric rail.
You are viewing an older report from April 15, 2026. A newer flow report is available for May 26, 2026.
View latest reportFlow Verdict
Watch next session: Follow-through on call premium at $115/$120 strikes (repeat or new large call flow); Monitoring additional front-dated put flow around $12122 (adds to the current 4/15 volume) and any heavy activity in the 4/17 expiry that would signal a bearish short-term pivot
Flow Summary
Net premium: +$34.7M bullish
P/C volume ratio: 1.04
P/C OI ratio: 1.58
Notable Prints
Read-through: Concentrated front-dated ITM put flow is meaningful for near-term downside risk; continued similar prints would increase likelihood of price gravitating to the lower end of the 2d expected-move ($117.30).
Read-through: This print strengthens the near-term downside hedge signal; if repeated or joined by fresh OI increases, it would materially raise the chance of a short-term pull toward the 2d EM lower bound.
Read-through: Adds to the cluster of expiry-day put demand around parity strikes; increases the weight of short-term downside hedging in today's flow.
Read-through: Meaningful long-dated call flow at $180 signals asymmetric upside speculation or replacement for leveraged exposure; supports a narrative of institutions buying skewed upside optionality while maintaining downside hedges.
Read-through: Deep-OTM protection with near-zero premium is noise for dealer gamma but indicates segmented demand for tail insurance.
Institutional Positioning
Call additions: $115, $120 and $110 strikes show the largest premium flow (deterministic top premium flow: $115 call net $19,037,640; $120 call net $9,763,708; $110 call net $8,019,024) 60 institutions are adding upside exposure concentrated in the 11025 band and selectively buying long-dated asymmetric upside (notably 7/17 $180 calls).
Put additions: Significant structural put OI remains at low strikes ($75, $80, $67, $68) and there's a material put cluster at $110 (OI=18,251). Importantly, front-dated expiry activity on 4/15 shows concentrated puts at $123 (Vol=7,206), $122 (Vol=5,563) and $121 (Vol=3,997) indicating active short-term protective buying or expiry management.
GEX/DEX consistency: Mixed: net premium is call-biased while GEX is modestly negative (-$1.9M). The coexistence of large call premium and front-dated put demand is consistent with dealers being short premium on the upside and cautious on the downside, producing a nuanced hedging environment.
OI clusters: Largest OI clusters create a long-dated put floor in the $6780 band (largest single OI $75 PUT = 45,105) and a near-term put concentration at $110 (18,251 OI). Call OI clusters at $120, $130 and $135 map to short-term pin/resistance potential, while the 7/17 $180 call flow introduces an asymmetric long-dated upside tail.
Hedging evidence: Clear: (1) front-dated ITM/near-ATM put activity on 4/15 ($123/$122/$121) signals immediate protective hedging or expiry rolls, (2) large long-dated put OI at low strikes indicates structural tail-hedges, and (3) concentrated call buying in the 11025 band will trigger dealer short-call hedging into near-term pin levels.
Max pain context: Current max pain pins are near $127 (4/15) and $110 (4/17). Flow is pulling premium into the $115–$125 area (call side) while large put OI and front-dated put activity keep the $110 pin/magnet live for the immediate next-week expiry.
Signal vs Noise
Key Conclusions
Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.
Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.
These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.