Home Options SPOTReports

SPOT

Spotify Technology S.A.Close $433.32EOD only

Max Pain

$440.00

Next expiry May 22, 2026

Expected Move

±$25.02

5.8% from close

Price Gap

+6.68

Distance to max pain

IV Rank

Middle-high premium

P/C OI

1.17

Slightly put-heavy

Consensus

4/4

Partial coverage

Published snapshot: May 20, 2026 close

End-of-day snapshot

This page reflects SPOT options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.

Published Snapshot

May 20, 2026 close

SPOT Flow Report

Analysis based on market close March 31, 2026

Directional Theta Gang Flow Earnings Consensus

Consensus-supported lens with chain history and key metrics in the rail.

Flow Verdict

Confidence:

4 / 10

base 3; +1 for consistent net negative premium; +0.5 for P/C >1; -0.5 for low volume/thin flow

Watch next session: Flow into $460-$480 puts for April expirations; Any call buying to defend the $500 level

Flow Summary

Net premium: -$18.8M bearish

P/C volume ratio: 1.06 — slight put lean

P/C OI ratio: 1.02 — neutral positioning

Net premium is decisively negative, indicating more money was spent on puts than calls. The flow is mixed but with a bearish tilt, as institutions show willingness to pay for downside protection, especially at elevated strikes far OTM.

Notable Prints

SPOT 4/17/26 $460 Put

Vol: 704

OI: 256

Vol/OI: 2.8x

IV: 45.9%

Notional: ~$340k (est. mid-price $0.97)

Intent: Fresh downside protection or bearish directional bet

Dual read: Bought (bearish) or sold/covered (neutral-bullish)

Read-through: This is the most significant single print. A 2.8x OI build at a strike ~5% below spot ($485) for a near-term expiration suggests a trader is positioning for a move lower or hedging a long position. The elevated volume vs. OI points to new positioning.

SPOT 7/17/26 $240 Put

Vol: 350

OI: 196

Vol/OI: 1.8x

IV: 72.6%

Notional: ~$70k (est. mid-price $0.40)

Intent: Long-term tail-risk hedge

Dual read: Bought (catastrophic hedge) or sold (yield generation)

Read-through: This is a deep OTM put (~50% below spot). The high IV (72.6%) suggests it's expensive. Buying here is a pure insurance play against a major crash. Selling would be a high-risk yield play. Given the net negative premium flow, buying is the more consistent read.

Institutional Positioning

Call additions: Minimal evidence of aggressive call buying. Top premium flow is negative across most strikes.

Put additions: Protection buying evident in the $460P (April) and deep OTM puts ($240P July). Large net negative premium at strikes $530-$920 suggests put buying/opening at elevated levels.

GEX/DEX consistency: Partially consistent. GEX is positive but very small (+$0.6M), indicating a weak pinning force. The bearish flow (negative premium) is at odds with the slightly positive GEX, suggesting flow is more influential than dealer positioning here.

OI clusters: Major call OI at $600 (3,043) and $500 (1,909). Major put OI at $410 (2,079) and $350 (1,926). This creates a wide range: a $500 call magnet/wall and a $410 put magnet.

Hedging evidence: Yes. The $460P and $240P prints are classic protective put structures. The massive net negative premium at strikes $700-$920, while likely part of complex structures, also indicates paid premium for far OTM protection.

Max pain context: Spot ($484.91) is below the nearest max pain ($490 for 3/27). The MP trend rises to $500+ in later expiries, suggesting OI gravity may pull price higher over time, conflicting with today's bearish flow.

Signal vs Noise

~The enormous net negative premium at strikes $700-$920 (e.g., -$5.4M at $700) is likely noise from structured products, collars, or ratio spreads. It's too far OTM (>45%) to be a pure directional signal for near-term trading.

~The $105 Call with +$1.4M net premium is almost certainly a leg of a complex trade (e.g., a diagonal, calendar, or part of a conversion) and not a bullish bet on SPOT hitting $105.

~Low overall volume (14,992) means individual prints carry more weight but the sample size is small. A single large institutional roll or hedge can skew the daily picture.

Key Conclusions

⚠️Flow has a bearish tilt with net negative premium, but confidence is low due to thin volume and structured product noise.

🛡️Institutions are actively buying puts for protection ($460P) and tail-risk hedging ($240P), not aggressively buying calls.

🧲OI creates conflicting magnets: $500 (call wall) vs. $410 (put wall). Max pain suggests a drift higher, but flow suggests fear of a move lower.

How to Use These Reports

This flow reflects the market close on March 31, 2026.

What the reports do

Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.

How traders use them

Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.

What to remember

These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.

If the report conviction and the raw data disagree, slow down and resolve the mismatch before sizing risk.