thetaOwl

ORCL

Oracle CorporationClose $189.77EOD only
Max Pain
$180.00
Next expiry May 22, 2026
Expected Move
±$5.00
2.6% from close
Price Gap
-9.77
Distance to max pain
IV Rank
41
Middle-high premium
P/C OI
0.88
Slightly call-heavy
Consensus
8.0/10
Bullish tilt
Published snapshot: May 21, 2026 close
End-of-day snapshot

This page reflects ORCL options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.

Published Snapshot
May 21, 2026 close
ORCL AI Consensus Report
Analysis based on market close April 6, 2026

Historical consensus-supported lens with full content, report chain context, and metric rail.

You are viewing an older report from April 6, 2026. A newer ai consensus report is available for May 14, 2026.

View latest report
Conviction
8.0

out of 10

8 not 9 because high IV and upcoming earnings in June add event risk and potential vol crush, slightly tempering conviction despite strong alignment.

Where Perspectives Agree

Bullish pin to $150-$155 — GEX negative supports trending moves with positive concentrations at those levels, and flow shows call volume dominance reinforcing upside bias.

Where They Diverge

No direct conflicts found — all personas align on bullish pin thesis with consistent signals from GEX, flow, and earnings regime.

Top Trade
via theta

Sell $140/$135 put spread 4/17 for credit — defined risk, profits from bullish pin and GEX support.

Key Risk

Break below $135 flips gamma long, breaking support and accelerating downside — invalidates the bullish pin thesis.

How to Use These Reports
This ai consensus reflects the market close on April 6, 2026.
What the reports do

Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.

How traders use them

Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.

What to remember

These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.

If the report conviction and the raw data disagree, slow down and resolve the mismatch before sizing risk.