QCOM
QUALCOMM IncorporatedClose $195.61EOD onlyThis page reflects QCOM options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.
Consensus-supported lens with chain history and key metrics in the rail.
Earnings Verdict
Earnings in ~29 days (Apr 29). IV for the May 1 expiration is elevated at 41.9% vs. surrounding tenors, indicating a crush play is viable. Historical data shows a consistent pattern of beating EPS estimates and positive post-earnings moves, supporting a directional long bias. However, bearish options flow and pinning near max pain add complexity.
Regime Classification
Earnings Overview
Next earnings: 2026-04-29 (29 days)explicit
Expected moves:
- 5/01 (31d): ±$12.43 (9.7%) [$116.35 - $141.20]
IV Setup
Term structure: Clear kink at 5/01 (31d) expiration at 41.9% IV, elevated vs. 35.5% (4/24) and 40.4% (5/15).
Crush estimate: ~6-8 vol pts post-earnings, back to ~35% range.
Skew: Flow is heavily bearish (P/C 1.95, net prem -$85M), but OI ratio is call-leaning (0.86). Unusual put buying in April expirations ($150, $155) suggests hedging or bearish bets.
Historical Context
Beat rate: 100% (4/4 quarters)
Avg move vs expected: Insufficient price move data provided, but 100% EPS beat rate suggests positive directional bias.
Directional bias: Positive (based on consistent EPS beats)
Key Levels
Flow Highlights
Massive bearish premium flow in OTM puts ($150-$200 strikes), netting -$44M at $195 put alone.
Institutional hedging or strong directional bearish bets far OTM, creating a long volatility tail risk.
Unusual volume in 4/17 $150 & $155 Puts (10x and 5.8x OI, IV 60-70%).
Traders buying expensive downside protection ahead of earnings, possibly hedging long stock or betting on a sharp drop.
Strategies
Risk Assessment
What to Watch
Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.
Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.
These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.