Home Options ORCLReports

ORCL

Oracle CorporationClose $181.46EOD only

Max Pain

$180.00

Next expiry May 22, 2026

Expected Move

±$9.10

5.0% from close

Price Gap

-1.46

Distance to max pain

IV Rank

Middle-high premium

P/C OI

0.88

Slightly call-heavy

Consensus

8.0/10

Bullish tilt

Published snapshot: May 19, 2026 close

End-of-day snapshot

This page reflects ORCL options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.

Published Snapshot

May 19, 2026 close

ORCL Flow Report

Analysis based on market close April 2, 2026

Directional Theta Gang Flow Earnings Consensus

Historical consensus-supported lens with full content, report chain context, and metric rail.

You are viewing an older report from April 2, 2026. A newer flow report is available for May 14, 2026.

View latest report

Flow Verdict

Confidence:

7 / 10

base 5; +2 massive bearish premium flow continues; +1 spot at max pain with negative GEX; -1 high IV suggests some hedging/vol selling

Watch next session: $136-$139 put flow for follow-through; Any call buying at $147-$150 to defend max pain

Flow Summary

Net premium: -$102.7M bearish

P/C volume ratio: 0.94 — near-neutral volume

P/C OI ratio: 0.86 — moderate call lean

Flow remains overwhelmingly bearish in premium terms, driven by continued massive purchases of far OTM puts. While volume is balanced, the net premium is deeply negative, indicating institutional money is paying up for downside protection. The negative GEX regime now aligns with this bearish flow.

Notable Prints

ORCL 4/17 $260 Put

Vol: 3,325

OI: 250

Vol/OI: 13.3x

IV: 168.4%

Notional: ~$38.6M

Intent: Large-scale downside hedge or bearish speculation

Dual read: Bought to open (bearish hedge/spec) vs. sold (volatility sale)

Read-through: Identical to the prior day's top print. The extreme IV (168.4%) and massive premium paid confirm this is a long put purchase. The persistence of this trade signals sustained institutional demand for catastrophic protection.

ORCL 4/10 $139 Put

Vol: 2,052

OI: 229

Vol/OI: 9.0x

IV: 50.3%

Notional: ~$2.1M (est. premium)

Intent: Near-term directional hedge

Dual read: Bought (bearish) vs. sold (covered put write)

Read-through: Strike is ~5% below spot, inside the 8-day expected move. This is a more tactical, cheaper hedge against an immediate drop. The high volume/OI ratio suggests fresh buying, adding a near-term bearish layer to the longer-dated OTM hedges.

ORCL 4/17 $136 Put

Vol: 1,588

OI: 194

Vol/OI: 8.2x

IV: 52.5%

Notional: ~$1.6M (est. premium)

Intent: Near-term protective put buying

Dual read: Bought (directional hedge) vs. sold (covered put write)

Read-through: Another tactical put purchase, slightly further out in time (April 17). The $136 strike aligns with the gamma flip estimate (~$135) and the $135 put OI cluster, marking a key technical support level that institutions are actively hedging.

ORCL 6/18 $270 Put

Vol: 1,010

OI: 151

Vol/OI: 6.7x

IV: 69.9%

Notional: ~$27.4M

Intent: Extension of bearish hedge into Q2

Dual read: Bought to open (bearish) vs. sold (vol sale)

Read-through: Follows the same pattern as the $260P but with a longer-dated (June) expiry. The high IV and large premium again point to long put buying, extending the bearish hedging timeline. This is not a one-off trade but a structured positioning shift.

ORCL 4/10 $144 Call

Vol: 1,034

OI: 324

Vol/OI: 3.2x

IV: 45.4%

Notional: ~$103k (est. premium)

Intent: Short-dated delta hedge or speculative long

Dual read: Bought (bullish breakout) vs. sold (covered call/hedge)

Read-through: The only notable call in unusual activity. Given its proximity to spot ($146.38) and max pain ($147), this is likely a short-term gamma scalp or part of a spread (e.g., a put spread's long call leg). Its premium is negligible compared to the put flow.

Institutional Positioning

Call additions: Minimal. Only notable is $144C 4/10, likely tactical.

Put additions: Massive OTM puts at $250-$300 (Apr/June). Tactical puts at $136-$139 (Apr/May).

GEX/DEX consistency: Yes — now aligned. Negative GEX (-$12.7M) is pro-cyclical (trending regime) and matches the bearish flow. This removes the prior day's mixed signal.

OI clusters: Major OI clusters: OTM Calls at $170-$330 (bullish leaps), OTM Puts at $90-$135 (long-term hedges). The $135 Put wall (13,007 OI) is the gamma flip estimate, a key support level.

Hedging evidence: Overwhelming and persistent. The multi-million dollar purchases of $260P, $270P, etc., are textbook institutional 'fat tail' hedging. The addition of nearer-term puts ($139P, $136P) adds a tactical bearish layer.

Max pain context: Spot ($146.38) is pinned at the nearest max pain ($147). However, negative GEX suggests pinning pressure may be weakening. Longer-dated max pain rises sharply ($160+), highlighting the divergence between long-term bullish structure and short-term bearish hedging.

Signal vs Noise

~The $85 Put 4/17 with high volume and 110.9% IV is likely a volatility sale (short put) given its extreme distance from spot (~42% OTM), not a directional bet.

~High OI in $200+ Calls are long-dated leaps (2026-2027) and not part of today's active flow signal.

~The $144 Call 4/10 activity is likely a short-term gamma scalp or spread leg given max pain pinning, not a pure bullish conviction bet.

Key Conclusions

⚠️Bearish flow intensifies and aligns with regime. Negative GEX (-$12.7M) now supports the pro-cyclical downside pressure indicated by massive put hedging.

🔄Key change from prior day: GEX flipped from positive (+$4.2M) to negative (-$12.7M), removing the pinning buffer and aligning with bearish flow.

🎯Critical levels: Breakdown below $144 (near-term support) targets the gamma flip/OI support at $135. Resistance is max pain at $147.

📅The flow represents a structural hedge. Long-term bullish positioning (high OTM call OI, rising max pain) is being aggressively protected against near-to-medium term downside.

How to Use These Reports

This flow reflects the market close on April 2, 2026.

What the reports do

Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.

How traders use them

Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.

What to remember

These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.

If the report conviction and the raw data disagree, slow down and resolve the mismatch before sizing risk.