HOOD
Robinhood Markets, Inc.Close $74.16EOD onlyThis page reflects HOOD options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.
Historical consensus-supported lens with full content, report chain context, and metric rail.
You are viewing an older report from March 31, 2026. A newer flow report is available for May 15, 2026.
View latest reportFlow Verdict
Watch next session: $66.11 spot vs. $60 PUT OI wall (13,418); Flow in the $69-$71 call strikes (4/10); Any change in the massive negative premium at $140
Flow Summary
Net premium: -$32.0M bearish
P/C volume ratio: 0.55 — call-dominant volume
P/C OI ratio: 0.67 — moderate put lean in positioning
Notable Prints
Read-through: This is the highest volume and most unusual print (11.7x OI). The strike is ~4.4% OTM with a 10-day duration. The elevated but not extreme IV (63.8%) and the sheer volume suggest this is likely bought flow, representing a high-conviction bet on a move above $69 by mid-April. It's a direct challenge to the bearish institutional put positioning.
Read-through: Extremely unusual by volume/OI ratio. The $50 strike is a major support level (12,542 OI) and the estimated gamma flip point. Buying puts 24% OTM with elevated IV 40 days out is a direct hedge against a breakdown to that key level. This is a meaningful addition to the bearish protection already in place.
Read-through: A follow-on print to the massive $130 put block from the prior report. The notional value remains very high (~$11M). Given the persistently massive negative net premium at the $130 strike (-$7.9M today), this is more likely new buying or rolling, not covering. It confirms the institutional bearish stance is being maintained, not abandoned.
Read-through: High volume in a 7.4% OTM call expiring in 10 days. This flow, alongside the $69C, forms a cluster of bullish speculation in the $69-$71 zone for the 4/10 expiry. It represents the 'other side' of the market's bifurcated view, betting on a swift rebound.
Read-through: This 15% OTM call adds to the speculative call cluster for 4/10. The lower IV (61.5%) compared to the puts suggests these are likely bought, not sold. The pattern is clear: fast money is piling into short-dated calls at various strikes, creating the call-dominant volume ratio that conflicts with the premium story.
Institutional Positioning
Call additions: Short-dated $69, $71, $76 calls (4/10) — speculative/retail flow, not institutional core positioning.
Put additions: Maintained large blocks in $130 (5/15) and $140 puts, plus new $50 put (5/8) hedging at key support.
GEX/DEX consistency: Yes — Strongly aligned. Negative GEX (-$11.2M) in a 'trending' regime persists. Dealers are short gamma and will amplify directional moves, which is consistent with the dominant bearish premium flow from institutions.
OI clusters: Major CALL wall at $80 (27,962 OI) remains the primary ceiling. Key PUT support clusters at $70 (12,481 OI) and the critical $60 (13,418 OI) and $50 (12,542 OI) levels. The $60 strike, with the highest near-spot put OI, is the estimated gamma flip and major support.
Hedging evidence: Overwhelming evidence continues. The net premium at strikes $140 (-$15.5M), $130 (-$7.9M), $125 (-$6.5M) is massively negative. The new $50 put block adds hedging at a key downside target. This is institutional-scale protection or bearish speculation.
Max pain context: Spot ($66.11) remains 9.4% below the 3/27 max pain ($73) and below most near-term MP levels ($68-$75). This creates a gravitational pull higher, but the dominant put flow and negative gamma are stronger forces for now. The rising MP trend into 2026 suggests the market's longer-term equilibrium is seen as higher.
Signal vs Noise
Key Conclusions
Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.
Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.
These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.