thetaOwl

BA

Boeing Company (The)Close $215.01EOD only
Max Pain
$225.00
Next expiry May 22, 2026
Expected Move
±$5.98
2.8% from close
Price Gap
+9.99
Distance to max pain
IV Rank
1
Low premium
P/C OI
0.75
Slightly call-heavy
Consensus
4/4
Partial coverage
Published snapshot: May 19, 2026 close
End-of-day snapshot

This page reflects BA options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.

Published Snapshot
May 19, 2026 close
BA Flow Report
Analysis based on market close March 31, 2026

Consensus-supported lens with chain history and key metrics in the rail.

Flow Verdict

BiasBearish
Confirmation: Sustained net premium outflow >$50M, spot break below $195 (gamma flip zone)
Invalidation: Net premium flips positive with call buying >$200, spot reclaims $205
Confidence:
7.5 / 10
base 5; +2 strong net premium bearish; +1 GEX/flow aligned; +0.5 spot at max pain; -1 P/C ratio not extreme

Watch next session: $200 level for max pain pin; Flow in $165-$180 puts for hedging; Any call buying to offset premium outflow

Flow Summary

Net premium: -$74.3M bearish

P/C volume ratio: 1.09 — slight put lean

P/C OI ratio: 0.88 — moderate call lean in positioning

Aggregate flow shows significant bearish premium outflow, driven by large put purchases at lower strikes. While volume is mixed, the magnitude of premium paid for downside protection is the dominant signal, aligning with negative gamma.

Notable Prints

#1
BA 4/2 $212.50 Call
Vol: 5,135
OI: 612
Vol/OI: 8.4x
IV: 40.8%
Notional: ~$1.02M (est. $2.00 avg premium)
Intent: Fresh directional call buying for a quick move above $212.50
Dual read: Bought (bullish breakout bet) or sold (covered call/writing)

Read-through: Given the high volume/OI and proximity to spot, this is likely a bullish bet targeting a move above the $210-$215 resistance zone before Friday expiry. However, it's an outlier against the broader bearish flow.

#2
BA 4/2 $205 Put
Vol: 4,027
OI: 2,650
Vol/OI: 1.5x
IV: 31.4%
Notional: ~$4.8M (est. $1.20 avg premium)
Intent: Fresh protective put buying or bearish directional bet
Dual read: Bought (bearish/protective) or sold (cash-secured put)

Read-through: High notional value and strike just below current price suggests institutional hedging or a bearish bet for a move below $205 by Friday. Consistent with the large net premium outflow for puts.

#3
BA 3/19/27 $165 Put
Vol: 1,983
OI: 1,242
Vol/OI: 1.6x
IV: 37.1%
Notional: ~$6.7M (est. $3.40 avg premium)
Intent: Long-dated tail-risk hedge or protective put
Dual read: Bought (long-term protection) or sold (legging into a put spread)

Read-through: Significant premium paid for protection over a year out. This is a meaningful institutional hedge, establishing a floor near the $165 gamma flip estimate. It's a clear signal of concern for deeper downside.

#4
BA 4/2 $215 Call
Vol: 4,583
OI: 644
Vol/OI: 7.1x
IV: 38.7%
Notional: ~$0.92M (est. $2.00 avg premium)
Intent: Fresh directional call buying, part of a breakout cluster with the $212.50C
Dual read: Bought (bullish) or sold (writing)

Read-through: Another high-volume, low-OI call print targeting a move above $215. This cluster of short-dated OTM calls is the primary bullish counter-signal but is overwhelmed in notional value by the bearish put flow.

#5
BA 8/21 $270 Call
Vol: 599
OI: 316
Vol/OI: 1.9x
IV: 37.0%
Notional: ~$0.24M (est. $4.00 avg premium)
Intent: Long-dated, far OTM call purchase for leveraged upside speculation
Dual read: Bought (lottery ticket) or sold (covered call on existing position)

Read-through: Low-cost, long-dated speculation. While interesting, the notional is small compared to the hedge flow. Likely a retail or speculative fund position, not a core institutional directional bet.

Institutional Positioning

Call additions: Short-dated $210-$217.50 calls (4/2, 4/10). Long-dated far OTM calls ($270 Aug '26).

Put additions: Significant premium in $205 puts (4/2) and massive long-dated $165 puts (Mar '27). Large OI clusters at $165, $175, $180, $185 puts.

GEX/DEX consistency: Yes — Negative GEX (-$5.7M) aligns with bearish net premium flow. Market is in a 'trending' gamma regime, amplifying moves.

OI clusters: Major call walls at $250 (29K OI) and $300 (33K OI). Major put walls at $165 (9.8K OI), $180 (7.6K OI), $185 (7K OI). Creates a wide range but with a defined downside floor near $165.

Hedging evidence: Strong evidence: Large premium paid for $205 and $165 puts. The $165 Mar '27 put is a definitive long-term hedge.

Max pain context: Spot ($199.03) is pinned exactly at near-term max pain ($200). This creates a magnetic pull but the bearish flow suggests institutions are hedging against a break lower.

Signal vs Noise

~The massive net premium outflow at the $265 strike (-$57.6M) is almost certainly a multi-leg spread or structured trade (e.g., put spread, collar). It's too large and isolated to be simple directional put buying and distorts the aggregate net premium figure.
~High-volume, low-OI calls ($212.50C, $215C) for 4/2 expiry could be part of a bullish bet, but also could be dealers closing short gamma positions ahead of expiry, given spot is at max pain.
~The $250 and $300 call OI walls are likely legacy positions (LEAPS or old speculative bets), not fresh bullish flow given the low volume.

Key Conclusions

⚠️Net premium strongly bearish (-$74M), dominated by put hedging at $205 and long-dated $165.
📉Negative GEX (-$5.7M) confirms a 'trending' regime; breaks below $195 could accelerate downward.
🎯Spot pinned at max pain ($200). Watch for a break, with flow suggesting downside is the path of least resistance.
🛡️Institutions are actively hedging tail risk (Mar '27 $165P), signaling underlying concern beyond near-term moves.
⚔️Contrast: Speculative call buying in short-dated $212.50-$215 calls provides a bullish counter-narrative but is smaller in notional value.
How to Use These Reports
This flow reflects the market close on March 31, 2026.
What the reports do

Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.

How traders use them

Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.

What to remember

These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.

If the report conviction and the raw data disagree, slow down and resolve the mismatch before sizing risk.