thetaOwl

QQQ

Invesco QQQ TrustClose $707.83EOD only
Max Pain
$723.00
Next expiry Jun 10, 2026
Expected Move
±$10.86
1.5% from close
Price Gap
+15.17
Distance to max pain
IV Rank
74
High premium
P/C OI
1.61
Slightly put-heavy
Consensus
7.0/10
Bullish tilt
Published snapshot: Jun 9, 2026 close
End-of-day snapshot

This page reflects QQQ options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.

Published Snapshot
Jun 9, 2026 close
QQQ AI Consensus Report
Analysis based on market close June 9, 2026

Historical consensus-supported lens with full content, report chain context, and metric rail.

Conviction
7.0

out of 10

7 not 8 because the $17 pin conflict reduces alignment, and negative gamma amplifies tail risk despite bullish consensus.

Where Perspectives Agree

All three personas converge on a bullish bias near $700-710, driven by dealer short gamma, aggressive call buying near expiry, and elevated put skew favoring defined-risk put selling.

Where They Diverge

Theta sees pin at $717 from high put OI, while flow's call buying suggests a gamma squeeze to $710; the $17 discrepancy in pin target creates uncertainty in optimal strike selection.

Top Trade
via theta

Sell 2026-07-10 $700.00/$698.00 put spread for $0.50 credit

Key Risk

Break below $680 invalidates the bullish thesis; dealer gamma flips long and put selling accelerates downside to $660.

How to Use These Reports
This ai consensus reflects the market close on June 9, 2026.
What the reports do

Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.

How traders use them

Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.

What to remember

These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.

If the report conviction and the raw data disagree, slow down and resolve the mismatch before sizing risk.