thetaOwl

MRVL

Marvell Technology, Inc.Close $281.26EOD only
Max Pain
$290.00
Next expiry Jun 26, 2026
Expected Move
±$13.27
4.7% from close
Price Gap
+8.74
Distance to max pain
IV Rank
33
Middle-high premium
P/C OI
1.17
Slightly put-heavy
Consensus
7.5/10
Bullish tilt
Published snapshot: Jun 25, 2026 close
End-of-day snapshot

This page reflects MRVL options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.

Published Snapshot
Jun 25, 2026 close
MRVL Flow Report
Analysis based on market close June 26, 2026

Historical consensus-supported lens with full content, report chain context, and metric rail.

Flow Verdict

BiasBearish
Confirmation: Sustained put/call ratios >1.3 and net premium negative
Invalidation: Spot reclaims $270 with positive gamma
Confidence:
6.5 / 10
base 5; +2 GEX/flow strongly aligned; -1 spot 6.4% from MP; +0.5 VIX 18

Watch next session: $265; $270

Flow Summary

Net premium: -$27.1M bearish

P/C volume ratio: 1.33

P/C OI ratio: 1.17

Net premium -$27M and put/call volume 1.33 confirm bearish flow. Negative gamma -$8.2M amplifies downside; spot below MP. Far OTM call selling and aggressive put buying reinforce bearish bias. High vol supports continuation.

Notable Prints

#1
MRVL 2026-06-26 $267.50 Call
Vol: 5,707
OI: 149
Vol/OI: 38.3x
IV: 16.7%
Notional: ~$86K
Intent: Speculative lottery ticket or closing of short OTM call.
Dual read: Could be a hedge against upside or pure speculation.

Read-through: Bearish skew as deep OTM calls expire worthless; likely closing.

#2
MRVL 2026-07-02 $155.00 Put
Vol: 36,954
OI: 2,332
Vol/OI: 15.8x
IV: 171.1%
Notional: ~$739K
Intent: High IV puts at far OTM strike; likely hedges or spec on crash.
Dual read: May be part of a put spread or tail risk hedge.

Read-through: Extreme bearish bet or tail hedge; aligns with bearish flow.

#3
MRVL 2026-07-02 $277.50 Call
Vol: 2,508
OI: 175
Vol/OI: 14.3x
IV: 84.7%
Notional: ~$2.2M
Intent: Bearish call writing or opening bullish call for earnings.
Dual read: Could be covered call or speculative upside bet.

Read-through: Neutral to bullish but high IV suggests caution.

#4
MRVL 2026-06-26 $265.00 Call
Vol: 3,692
OI: 264
Vol/OI: 14.0x
IV: 22.9%
Notional: ~$738K
Intent: Bearish selling of atm call or closing of short position.
Dual read: Could be opening bullish call or covering short.

Read-through: Profit-taking or bearish view; aligns with put/call ratio.

#5
MRVL 2026-07-02 $285.00 Call
Vol: 2,796
OI: 352
Vol/OI: 7.9x
IV: 84.1%
Notional: ~$1.8M
Intent: Bearish call writing due to low premium and high vol.
Dual read: Speculative bullish bet or part of spread.

Read-through: Bearish sentiment if sold; neutral if bought.

Institutional Positioning

Call additions: OTM calls at 267.5, 265, 270, 275 with high vol/oi

Put additions: Heavy put volume at $155 (far OTM) and $265

GEX/DEX consistency: GEX negative (-$8.2M), DEX positive (+50.6M shares) – inconsistent, dealers long stock but short gamma

OI clusters: Largest OI at $265 put (1990) and $270 call (1383)

Hedging evidence: Potential hedging via $155 puts; collars unclear

Max pain context: Spot below MP; likely pinning to higher levels

Signal vs Noise

~Heavy put volume at $155 (vol/oi 15.8) is noise – too far OTM, likely tail risk hedge
~High vol/oi on OTM calls near expiration (e.g., 267.5, 270) is noise – speculative gamma plays
~Net premium negative with put/call ratio >1 and bearish flow is signal of institutional selling

Key Conclusions

🔴Bearish flow: net premium -$27M, put/call vol 1.33, OI 1.17
⚠️Spot 6.4% from MP, VIX 18, negative gamma – increased tail risk
How to Use These Reports
This flow reflects the market close on June 26, 2026.
What the reports do

Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.

How traders use them

Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.

What to remember

These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.

If the report conviction and the raw data disagree, slow down and resolve the mismatch before sizing risk.