thetaOwl

INTC

Intel CorporationClose $107.92EOD only
Max Pain
$107.00
Next expiry Jun 12, 2026
Expected Move
±$8.00
7.4% from close
Price Gap
-0.92
Distance to max pain
IV Rank
78
High premium
P/C OI
1.02
Balanced positioning
Consensus
7.0/10
Range bias
Published snapshot: Jun 9, 2026 close
End-of-day snapshot

This page reflects INTC options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.

Published Snapshot
Jun 9, 2026 close
INTC AI Consensus Report
Analysis based on market close June 9, 2026

Historical consensus-supported lens with full content, report chain context, and metric rail.

Conviction
7.0

out of 10

7 not 8 because while pinning alignment is strong, the bullish flow signal conflicts with the earnings/theta presumption of mean reversion, reducing conviction in a single directional outcome.

Where Perspectives Agree

All personas converge on a pinning thesis near $107 supported by strong dealer gamma and max pain, with high vol regime favoring rangebound trade.

Where They Diverge

Flow shows bullish call accumulation contradicting earnings' expectation of post-event IV crush and rangebound pin; directional's upside potential to $115.92 conflicts with theta's defined risk short strangle that profits from pin but not directional breakout.

Top Trade
via theta

Sell 2026-07-17 $97.50 put / $130.00 call strangle for $4.00 credit

Key Risk

Break below $99.92 or above $115.92 invalidates pin thesis, triggering dealer gamma flip and accelerating move toward next support/resistance.

How to Use These Reports
This ai consensus reflects the market close on June 9, 2026.
What the reports do

Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.

How traders use them

Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.

What to remember

These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.

If the report conviction and the raw data disagree, slow down and resolve the mismatch before sizing risk.