thetaOwl

EEM

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETFClose $63.64EOD only
Max Pain
$60.00
Next expiry Apr 24, 2026
Expected Move
±$0.89
1.4% from close
Price Gap
-3.64
Distance to max pain
IV Rank
100
High premium
P/C OI
1.41
Slightly put-heavy
Consensus
6.5/10
Range bias
Published snapshot: Apr 17, 2026 close
End-of-day snapshot

This page reflects EEM options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.

Published Snapshot
Apr 17, 2026 close
EEM Flow Report
Analysis based on market close April 20, 2026

Historical consensus-supported lens with full content, report chain context, and metric rail.

Flow Verdict

BiasBearish
Confirmation: Large, concentrated put prints (May/Jul 63/57/62 strikes), high put/call volume (2.70) and negative net premium support bearish flow.
Invalidation: Sustained rally above gamma flip (~55) with significant call buying or rapid VIX decline would invalidate bearish flow.
Confidence:
5 / 10
base 5; -1 GEX/flow contradict; +1 GEX positive (pinning); -0.5 spot 3.6% from MP; +0.5 VIX 19

Watch next session: Front-month put flow at 61.5-63 and Jul 57-62 strikes; Spot vs gamma flip level and net delta change; VIX direction and intraday premium accumulation

Flow Summary

Net premium: -$5.7M bearish

P/C volume ratio: 2.70

P/C OI ratio: 1.53

Bearish bias: concentrated institutional put buying and elevated put/call metrics dominate despite pinning gamma; risk clears if spot rallies past gamma flip or calls materially absorb puts.

Notable Prints

#1
EEM 2026-05-15 $63.00 Put
Vol: 5,101
OI: 223
Vol/OI: 22.9x
IV: 27.8%
Notional: ~$765K
Intent: short puts (sell-to-open)
Dual read: protective buys

Read-through: near-term bearish/collector

#2
EEM 2026-07-17 $57.00 Put
Vol: 12,466
OI: 939
Vol/OI: 13.3x
IV: 27.6%
Notional: ~$1.2M
Intent: directional put accumulation
Dual read: spread legting

Read-through: lower-for-longer bias

#3
EEM 2026-04-24 $61.50 Put
Vol: 2,182
OI: 272
Vol/OI: 8.0x
IV: 30.1%
Notional: ~$61K
Intent: near-dated downside play
Dual read: liquidity takedown

Read-through: short-term risk hedging

#4
EEM 2026-07-17 $62.00 Put
Vol: 6,549
OI: 993
Vol/OI: 6.6x
IV: 24.4%
Notional: ~$1.5M
Intent: sizey bearish put buy/sell
Dual read: pinning sell-side flow

Read-through: pressure into summer

#5
EEM 2026-07-17 $53.00 Put
Vol: 4,053
OI: 935
Vol/OI: 4.3x
IV: 33.4%
Notional: ~$182K
Intent: deep-protection buying
Dual read: long-dated hedge

Read-through: tail-risk concern

Institutional Positioning

Call additions: Put-heavy blocks concentrated 57–63 (May–Jul) with rolls into longer-dated Nov 60; some call buying not dominant

Put additions: Notable OI-adds in May/Jul 57–63; short-dated defensive puts 4/24–5/15 present

GEX/DEX consistency: GEX positive and DEX buy activity align with pinning pressure, but mixed signals exist

OI clusters: Largest OI peaks near 60–63 and 53–57; gamma flip ~55 could counterbalance downside—uncertainty ~25–40% on net effect

Hedging evidence: Evidence of protective puts and likely collars; net premium flows suggest hedging demand but some roll/rebalancing visible

Max pain context: Max pain low 60s; spot ~3.6% above MP, pinning bias plausible but not certain

Signal vs Noise

~Signal: concentrated Jul put blocks with high OI at 60–63
~Noise: small-lot short-dated prints lacking OI follow-through
~Signal: GEX/DEX alignment increases pinning probability but gamma flip near 55 is a material counter-signal

Key Conclusions

⚠️Institutions likely bearish/hedging—concentrated puts and rolls point to low-60s pinning, but mixed flows and gamma flip near 55 introduce meaningful uncertainty.
🔎OI clusters (60–63, 53–57) and GEX/DEX support the put signal; ignore isolated low-OI prints when assessing trend.
How to Use These Reports
This flow reflects the market close on April 20, 2026.
What the reports do

Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.

How traders use them

Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.

What to remember

These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.

If the report conviction and the raw data disagree, slow down and resolve the mismatch before sizing risk.