thetaOwl

EEM

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETFClose $69.10EOD only
Max Pain
$66.00
Next expiry Jun 5, 2026
Expected Move
±$0.98
1.4% from close
Price Gap
-3.10
Distance to max pain
IV Rank
99
High premium
P/C OI
1.83
Slightly put-heavy
Consensus
5.5/10
Consensus signal
Published snapshot: Jun 4, 2026 close
End-of-day snapshot

This page reflects EEM options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.

Published Snapshot
Jun 4, 2026 close
EEM Flow Report
Analysis based on market close June 4, 2026

Historical consensus-supported lens with full content, report chain context, and metric rail.

Flow Verdict

BiasBearish
Confirmation: Heavy put buying at $58.5 and $64 strikes with high vol/oi ratios shows bearish positioning.
Invalidation: Break above $77 call strike or shift in put/call ratios.
Confidence:
5.5 / 10
base 5; -1 GEX/flow contradict; +1 GEX positive (pinning); -0.5 spot 4.7% from MP; +1 VIX 15

Watch next session: Monitor $58.5 and $64 put activity

Flow Summary

Net premium: -$13.1M bearish

P/C volume ratio: 2.79

P/C OI ratio: 1.83

EEM sees aggressive put buying, especially near-term $58.5 and $64 strikes with huge vol/oi, indicating bearish sentiment. Net negative premium and high put/call ratios confirm. Positive gamma may pin spot but flow is bearish.

Notable Prints

#1
EEM 2026-07-17 $58.50 Put
Vol: 15,004
OI: 184
Vol/OI: 81.5x
IV: 46.4%
Notional: ~$840K
Intent: Bearish speculation or hedge
Dual read: Part of put spread

Read-through: Expect drop below $58.50 by July

#2
EEM 2026-07-17 $77.00 Call
Vol: 7,042
OI: 126
Vol/OI: 55.9x
IV: 33.3%
Notional: ~$458K
Intent: Bullish speculation or covered call
Dual read: Short call income trade

Read-through: Rally to $77+ or neutral income

#3
EEM 2026-06-26 $64.00 Put
Vol: 16,686
OI: 412
Vol/OI: 40.5x
IV: 43.7%
Notional: ~$1.4M
Intent: Bearish bet near-term
Dual read: Protective put

Read-through: Risk to $64 by June expiry

#4
EEM 2026-06-26 $65.00 Put
Vol: 4,694
OI: 744
Vol/OI: 6.3x
IV: 44.6%
Notional: ~$432K
Intent: Additional bearish positioning
Dual read: Put ladder component

Read-through: Hedge against decline to $65

#5
EEM 2026-07-17 $59.00 Put
Vol: 1,003
OI: 550
Vol/OI: 1.8x
IV: 42.8%
Notional: ~$32K
Intent: Continuation bearish view
Dual read: Rolling from other strikes

Read-through: Expect $59 support break

Institutional Positioning

Call additions: Minimal call activity; one large call trade at $77 July (vol/OI 55.9) but likely noise.

Put additions: Heavy put buying at $58.5 and $64 strikes (July & June expirations); vol/OI ratios 81.5 and 40.5.

GEX/DEX consistency: GEX positive ($+125.9M) but flow bearish (put/call vol ratio 2.79); inconsistency suggests hedging.

OI clusters: Largest OI ~172k puts at $55 (20.4% below spot) and scattered OI at $58.5, $64.

Hedging evidence: Put additions at deep OTM strikes indicate institutional hedging against EM downside.

Max pain context: Spot $62.8 vs MP near $60; 4.7% above pinning zone, gamma flip at $55.

Signal vs Noise

~Heavy put volume at $58.5 and $64 is real signal of bearish hedging.
~Isolated call prints at $77 are likely noise or speculative.
~GEX positive despite bearish flow suggests positioning is complex; focus on put clustering.

Key Conclusions

🐻Institutions hedging via puts; flow heavily bearish with put/call vol ratio 2.8.
📌Positive GEX may pin spot near $60 MP; but hedging pressure could drive below.
How to Use These Reports
This flow reflects the market close on June 4, 2026.
What the reports do

Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.

How traders use them

Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.

What to remember

These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.

If the report conviction and the raw data disagree, slow down and resolve the mismatch before sizing risk.