EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETFClose $63.38EOD onlyThis page reflects EEM options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.
Historical consensus-supported lens with full content, report chain context, and metric rail.
Outlook
Moderately bullish bias: spot trading above dealer max-pain with positive dealer GEX and DEX suggests pinning around $62–$64 in the short run; expect contained upside toward $65 if SPX-led risk appetite persists, but watch for downside if pinning breaks and flows flip.
Conflicts: Mixed flow, term put concentration below spot (tail risk)
Regime Classification
Price Range Forecast
Key Levels
Dealer Positioning (GEX/DEX)
GEX: $+232.5M
DEX: +148.0M shares
Gamma flip: ~$55 (Approx — based on put OI concentration of 218,974 (13.2% below spot))
NTM gamma: Dealer GEX ≈ +$232.5M, DEX +148M shares; gamma flip ~ $55 (put OI concentrated ~13% below spot).
IV Analysis
IV vs VIX: EEM IV ~in line with VIX/peers (normal) — not rich, so buying directional risk is cheaper; selling premium less attractive absent skew.
Term structure: Relatively flat near-term with put-heavy concentration into late-Apr/early-May expiries creating local knee in term-structure.
Skew: Skew shows put concentration below spot — opportunity to buy downside protection selectively or sell premium above pinned band if comfortable with tail risk.
Flow Analysis
Net premium: Net premium large positive ≈$13.37M indicating net credit/seller flow; despite heavy call volume the overall footprint aligns with net selling (calls likely sold or part of spreads/rolls rather than pure buys).
Directional prints: 25.6 call 68 OTM 2026-06-18 — 10,003 vol vs 5,780 OI (vol/oi 1.7): large June 68 activity—likely call sells or spread rolls given net credit, not outright directional buys. 27.7 call 63.5 OTM 2026-06-18 — 4,910 vol vs 120 OI (vol/oi 40.9): aggressive new/complex call flow; in context of net credit likely dealer-initiated sells or structured buys/sells (spreads). 28.1 put 62 OTM 2026-05-01 — 4,252 vol vs 135 OI (vol/oi 31.5): heavy short-dated put activity—could be protective buys or put selling; combined with net credit suggests significant put selling/hedge positioning.
Unusual: 27.7 call 63.5 OTM 2026-06-18 — Extremely high vol/OI — large new call flow but likely sold or spreaded given overall net credit. 25.6 call 68 OTM 2026-06-18 — Very large size in Jun 68 calls—unusual but consistent with seller-dominant/roll activity. 28.1 put 62 OTM 2026-05-01 — Large short-dated put prints — notable downside/hedge activity; could reflect put selling into premium inflow.
Risks & Catalysts
Strategy Viability
| Strategy | Edge | Best Setup | Primary Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Put credit spread | Moderate-Strong | Sell 2026-05-15 $62.00/$59.00 put spread Why now: Moderately bullish bias, net seller footprint and concentrated call selling; sell short-dated/intermediate put spread to harvest premium while limiting tail risk. | Pin breaks downward or EM-specific shock causing rapid put demand. |
| Bull call spread | Moderate-Weak | Buy 2026-05-22 $65.00/$68.00 call spread Why now: Bias toward contained upside and dealer pin near 62–64; use debit call spread to keep cost low vs naked call. | Large risk-on move pushes calls higher or IV rises, reducing spread attractiveness. Liquidity constraints: short_call: Wide spread (75%). |
| Iron condor | Weak | Sell 2026-05-08 $62.00/$60.50 put wing and $64.50/$67.00 call wing Why now: Net selling footprint and pinning suggest limited near-term move; iron condor sells premium both tails with defined risk. | Sudden directional break (SPX-led or EM event) can breach wings causing losses. Liquidity constraints: long_put: Volume below 5.; short_call: Open interest below 25.; long_call: Wide spread (115%). |
Top Plays
Watchlist Triggers
Tactical Summary
Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.
Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.
These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.