Home Options PLTRReports

PLTR

Palantir Technologies Inc.Close $135.53EOD only

Max Pain

$144.00

Next expiry Jun 12, 2026

Expected Move

±$7.70

5.7% from close

Price Gap

+8.47

Distance to max pain

IV Rank

100

High premium

P/C OI

0.87

Slightly call-heavy

Consensus

6.0/10

Consensus signal

Published snapshot: Jun 5, 2026 close

End-of-day snapshot

This page reflects PLTR options positioning from the latest published market-close snapshot. Intraday price and contract changes are not displayed.

Published Snapshot

Jun 5, 2026 close

PLTR Flow Report

Analysis based on market close June 8, 2026

Directional Theta Gang Flow Earnings Consensus

Historical consensus-supported lens with full content, report chain context, and metric rail.

Flow Verdict

Confidence:

4 / 10

base 5; -1 GEX/flow contradict; -0.5 spot 3.2% from MP; +0.5 VIX 19

Watch next session: 140; 137; 136

Flow Summary

Net premium: +$15.8M bullish

P/C volume ratio: 0.45

P/C OI ratio: 0.94

Heavy call buying near 137-140 strikes drives bullish net premium. High vol, but spot below MP and negative GEX warrant caution. Bias bullish on call flow dominance.

Notable Prints

PLTR 2026-06-12 $137.00 Call

Vol: 6,722

OI: 923

Vol/OI: 7.3x

IV: 50.2%

Notional: ~$2.0M

Intent: Bullish speculation

Dual read: Closing unlikely due low OI

Read-through: Trader expects near-term upside

PLTR 2026-06-12 $136.00 Call

Vol: 3,311

OI: 760

Vol/OI: 4.4x

IV: 50.1%

Notional: ~$1.1M

Intent: Unclear flow intent

Read-through: Needs contextual interpretation.

PLTR 2026-06-18 $137.00 Put

Vol: 2,617

OI: 664

Vol/OI: 3.9x

IV: 49.4%

Notional: ~$1.3M

Intent: Protective put buying

Dual read: Could be sell puts for premium

Read-through: Hedging or bearish bet

PLTR 2026-06-12 $140.00 Call

Vol: 12,955

OI: 3,394

Vol/OI: 3.8x

IV: 50.1%

Notional: ~$2.3M

Intent: Aggressive call buying

Dual read: May be part of spread

Read-through: Strong bullish conviction, targeting $140+

PLTR 2026-07-10 $125.00 Put

Vol: 1,174

OI: 323

Vol/OI: 3.6x

IV: 49.3%

Notional: ~$375K

Intent: Unclear flow intent

Read-through: Needs contextual interpretation.

Institutional Positioning

Call additions: Aggressive call buying at 136-141 strikes for June 12 expiry (vol/OI >3.5), largest at 140C (12,955 vol).

Put additions: Notable put activity at 125 and 120 strikes for July (vol/OI ~3.5) and near-dated 128P (3,511 vol).

GEX/DEX consistency: GEX negative (-$3.9M) flows contradict DEX positive (+86M shares), suggesting dealers hedging short calls with long stock.

OI clusters: Largest OI: 140C (3,394), 128P (1,382), 148C (975), 137C (923). Concentrated at 120-148 range.

Hedging evidence: July put buys at 120/125 and near-dated 128P indicate downside hedging against bullish call positions.

Max pain context: Spot 3.2% below MP; gamma flip at 120 suggests potential pinning near 120-128 zone.

Signal vs Noise

~Signal: Heavy call buying in June 12 expiry with vol/OI ratios >3.5 indicates institutional bullish bets.

~Signal: Simultaneous put buying at lower strikes (July) for hedging—consistent with risk management.

~Noise: High vol/OI on 205C (109% IV) is likely speculative noise, low OI (220) and deep OTM.

~Noise: Small put volume at 137C (expiry June 18) with only 664 OI—not significant.

Key Conclusions

📈Concentrated call volume on June 12 136-141 strikes suggests bullish positioning for weekly expiry.

🛡️July put buys at 120/125 show hedging tail risk, consistent with portfolio protection.

How to Use These Reports

This flow reflects the market close on June 8, 2026.

What the reports do

Each report translates the same market-close options snapshot into a specific lens such as directional bias, premium-selling posture, flow quality, or earnings setup.

How traders use them

Reports are most useful for narrowing the playbook, surfacing entry and risk context, and deciding which raw data page to inspect next.

What to remember

These are interpretation layers, not execution guarantees. Validate the setup against chain liquidity, expected move, and exposure before sizing risk.

If the report conviction and the raw data disagree, slow down and resolve the mismatch before sizing risk.